Just found some sles15sp6 testsuites are using the sles15sp5 testsuites' autoyast profiles, need to make a copy for SLES15SP6. So add [WIP] here.

there is a lot of duplication of files, would be better to convert them to templates and then do an if in the section for ltss, but at this point I guess it should be ok like this ... just take into account for the future that when you need to create so many similar files, something is wrong.

there is a lot of duplication of files, would be better to convert them to templates and then do an if in the section for ltss, but at this point I guess it should be ok like this ... just take into account for the future that when you need to create so many similar files, something is wrong.

So do you suggest to use if for this ticket?

there is a lot of duplication of files, would be better to convert them to templates and then do an if in the section for ltss, but at this point I guess it should be ok like this ... just take into account for the future that when you need to create so many similar files, something is wrong.

So do you suggest to use if for this ticket?

I'm ok with both, but if doesn't cost too much, I would not duplicate files.

there is a lot of duplication of files, would be better to convert them to templates and then do an if in the section for ltss, but at this point I guess it should be ok like this ... just take into account for the future that when you need to create so many similar files, something is wrong.

I think it is ok for current design that each service pack has different profile, since not only the difference for ltss but also other modules (dropped or added) and patterns, etc. between service packs. Later maybe think a better template to cover all SPs. :)

there is a lot of duplication of files, would be better to convert them to templates and then do an if in the section for ltss, but at this point I guess it should be ok like this ... just take into account for the future that when you need to create so many similar files, something is wrong.

I think it is ok for current design that each service pack has different profile, since not only the difference for ltss but also other modules (dropped or added) and patterns, etc. between service packs. Later maybe think a better template to cover all SPs. :)

yes, that is the general case, but for this specific case, seems that the package/pattern didn't change, only what was added for ltss, could you please confirm that @chcao ?

SP7 is a refresh version so it is not expected so many changes. But anyway if it is like that, that was the only change, still I'm fine if SM creates a ticket to work on this later and merge this now. If more than that change was needed, then no need for a ticket.

there is a lot of duplication of files, would be better to convert them to templates and then do an if in the section for ltss, but at this point I guess it should be ok like this ... just take into account for the future that when you need to create so many similar files, something is wrong.

I think it is ok for current design that each service pack has different profile, since not only the difference for ltss but also other modules (dropped or added) and patterns, etc. between service packs. Later maybe think a better template to cover all SPs. :)

yes, that is the general case, but for this specific case, seems that the package/pattern didn't change, only what was added for ltss, could you please confirm that @chcao ?

SP7 is a refresh version so it is not expected so many changes. But anyway if it is like that, that was the only change, still I'm fine if SM creates a ticket to work on this later and merge this now. If more than that change was needed, then no need for a ticket.

Both with current design and add if for ltss are fine for me. From the point of view SP differences, we didn't see any differences between 15sp5 and 15sp6 so far, and we made the profile as short as we can just in case of any differences among SP installations. If we would add a better template to cover all SPs, we could start from these profiles by using if for modules registration. I will update this PR.

Both with current design and add if for ltss are fine for me. From the point of view SP differences, we didn't see any differences between 15sp5 and 15sp6 so far, and we made the profile as short as we can just in case of any differences among SP installations. If we would add a better template to cover all SPs, we could start from these profiles by using if for modules registration. I will update this PR.

Discussed with Lemon, he would file a ticket to create a better template to cover all SPs, the changes would cover the duplicated profiles in this PR, so I don't need to update this PR any more.

Created ticket https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/177009